Quantcast
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 13008

Re: Count Distinct for Distinct?

count ( distinct [name id] for [account] ) should be exactly what you're after, if I understand your description correctly. One thing you want to look out for when using relational is, do not try to aggregate *both* over the aggregate function of a dat...

Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 13008

Trending Articles



<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>